What is the legal term for Sarah's injury caused by Sam's failure to place a caution sign?

The legal term for Sarah's injury resulting from Sam's failure to place a caution sign is classified as a negligent tort. Negligence occurs when an individual fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. In this scenario, Sam had a duty to provide a warning regarding a potential hazard, and by neglecting to do so, he breached that duty, which can be directly linked to Sarah’s injury.

Negligent torts typically involve scenarios where the responsible party did not intend to cause harm, but their lack of reasonable care led to an injury. This concept underscores the importance of maintaining certain standards of conduct and responsibility in situations where others may be put at risk.

In contrast, an intentional tort involves deliberate actions intended to cause harm, such as assault or battery, which does not apply here since there was no intent to harm. Strict liability pertains to cases where a party is held liable regardless of fault, usually in inherently dangerous activities or defective products, which does not relate to the failure to provide a caution sign. Foreseeable risk refers to the idea that a reasonable person would anticipate the potential for harm, but it doesn’t describe the legal classification of the injury itself. Thus, the best fit for this scenario is negligent