In the scenario where Carissa gets injured while retrieving a forgotten hard drive, which statement is true regarding her workers' compensation coverage?

In this scenario, the key factor to consider is the nature of Carissa's actions at the time she sustained her injuries. Although she was retrieving a forgotten hard drive, which might initially seem like a work-related activity, it is crucial to recognize that the act of going back to retrieve personal items is typically not covered under workers' compensation.

When analyzed under Connecticut's workers' compensation laws, injuries that occur while an employee is commuting are generally not compensable. This is based on the "going and coming" rule, which states that an employee is not considered to be within the course and scope of employment while commuting to and from work.

In this context, since Carissa's injury occurred while she was presumably leaving her workplace to retrieve a personal item, it falls under the commuting exclusion. The nuances of workers' compensation claims emphasize that activities performed off the clock or that are not strictly related to workplace duties often do not qualify for coverage, even if they seem related to work. Thus, stating that her injuries are not compensable because she was commuting is accurate in this case.