In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, if Jewell was 10% at fault and her damage award is $22,000, how much will it be reduced by?

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, damages are assessed based on the degree of fault attributed to each party involved in an accident. In this case, Jewell is found to be 10% at fault for the incident that resulted in her damages.

To determine the amount by which Jewell's damage award will be reduced, the percentage of fault (10%) is applied to the total damage amount of $22,000. This is calculated by taking 10% of $22,000, which equals $2,200.

Therefore, Jewell's damage award will be reduced by this amount due to her being partially at fault. Hence, from her original award of $22,000, the reduction results in a final compensation amount of $19,800. This demonstrates the principle of pure comparative negligence, where the compensation corresponds to the actual loss minus the proportion of fault.